My friend JJ pointed out a great blog post to me today that I encourage those who might be equally agitated by all of this to read. I think we live in a time where we are celebrating those who make the choice to have many many children. Just look at the shows on TLC like "Jon and Kate plus 8" and "17 Kids and Counting" (now changed to 18 because they have bred again). You all ways see (about every 9 months) these 18 kids folks on tv - "look, we did it again" - give me a break! They are from Arkansas near where I went to undergrad. If you can afford them, guess it a free world, but still! The planet is already over populated!I have friends who have not been able to have kids and I feel bad for them. They would be great parents! And they have to see stories like this on the news about a family who already has 6 kids having 8 more - at once. It is ridiculous. It seems like the ones who can't have kids have to have a large amount of cash, and they they can get their baby. But the ones who don't, well, too bad, and they are often the ones who would be the best parents and have good kids. And then there is the other side of the coin, those that have kids and shouldn't. Either they can't feed them, or take care of them, or they just do not care about them what so ever. Yet these are the people who have 5 or 6 kids already. And my tax dollars get to pay for it instead of them just getting free birth control or not having sex. It really makes me mad! And makes me think of this classic movie clip that pretty much sums it up:
5 comments:
What I'd like to know is: what did it cost the hospital and those 40-some doctors to facilitate this travesty of nature? From Rob, at http://shakingearth.blogspot.com
I agree! And now there is more to the story - she is single (according to Fix News), 33 (and already have 6 kids), living with her parents, and has a nanny!! I guess money really can buy anything.
Hey, I hear you -- but even people who have a 'sensible' number of children are prone to avoiding the nature of their decision.
A Pal: "Well, me and Celeste aren't gonna have more than two children. We're just replacing ourselves."
The Oaf: "Uhhhh... so are you gonna freeze sperm and commit suicide before child one and Celeste is gonna kill herself immediately following the birth of child two?"
A Pal: "Dude..."
The Oaf: "Well, what's two plus one? What's two plus two?"
A pal: "... #@*& you."
The Oaf: "I'm just asking for your figures."
And that was when I realized that sense and parenthood have nothing to do with each other.
This is a good point Sean!
I would agree with Sean that families should (but usually don't) consider the impacts of their planning (or lack thereof) on resource use. Yet I don't agree with his example, because by the time the two children were born, even if both parents were still alive, a grandmother and second cousin might have died in the meantime. Having two children is still below the replacement fertility rate. But yes, Sean's final realization is especially correct!
Post a Comment